By Colleen Slevin and Jesse Bedayn, The Related Press
On the heels of a U.S. Supreme Court docket victory this summer season for a graphic artist who didn’t wish to design marriage ceremony web sites for same-sex {couples}, Colorado’s highest courtroom mentioned Tuesday it would now hear the case of a Christian baker who refused to make a cake celebrating a gender transition.
The announcement by the Colorado Supreme Court docket is the newest improvement within the yearslong authorized saga involving Jack Phillips and LGBTQ+ rights.
Phillips received a partial victory earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court docket in 2018 after refusing to make a homosexual couple’s marriage ceremony cake.
He was later sued by Autumn Scardina, a transgender girl, after Phillips and his suburban Denver bakery refused to make a pink cake with blue frosting for her birthday and to have a good time her gender transition.
Scardina, an lawyer, mentioned she introduced the lawsuit to “problem the veracity” of Phillips’ statements that he would serve LGBTQ+ prospects. Her lawyer mentioned her cake order was not a “arrange” supposed to file a lawsuit.
The Colorado Supreme Court docket didn’t clarify how or why it made the willpower to listen to the case. It was introduced in a protracted listing of selections about which instances they may hear and reject.
The case includes the state’s anti-discrimination legislation that makes it unlawful to refuse to offer companies to individuals primarily based on protected traits like race, faith or sexual orientation. The important thing concern within the case is whether or not the desserts Phillips creates are a type of speech and whether or not forcing him to make a cake with a message he doesn’t help is a violation of his First Modification proper to free speech.
Earlier this yr, the Colorado Court docket of Appeals sided with Scardina within the case, ruling that the cake — on which Scardina didn’t request any writing — was not a type of speech. It additionally discovered that the state’s anti-discrimination legislation doesn’t violate enterprise house owners’ proper to apply or categorical their faith.
Graphic artist Lorie Smith, who can also be from Colorado and can also be represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, challenged the identical state legislation within the 303 Artistic case that was determined by the U.S. Supreme Court docket in June. The courtroom’s conservative majority mentioned forcing her to create web sites for same-sex weddings would violate her free speech rights.
Each side within the dispute over Scardina’s cake order suppose the brand new U.S. Supreme Court docket ruling will bolster their arguments.
“We’re grateful that the Colorado Supreme Court docket will hear Jack Phillips’ case to hopefully uphold each Coloradan’s freedom to precise what they imagine,” mentioned Jake Warner, Phillips’ Alliance Defending Freedom lawyer. “Jack has been focused for years by opponents of free speech, and because the U.S. Supreme Court docket just lately held in 303 Artistic v. Elenis, nobody must be pressured to precise messages they disagree with.”
Scardina’s lawyer, John McHugh, mentioned that the 303 Artistic ruling was slim and utilized solely to companies which can be creating speech of their very own — which the Colorado Court docket of Appeals had already dominated didn’t embrace Phillips’ firm making the cake.
“It’s crucial for companies and the general public in Colorado to know that our anti-discrimination legislation nonetheless is in full drive and there’s no common proper to discriminate in opposition to individuals in Colorado should you’re a enterprise proprietor,” McHugh mentioned.
Phillips requested the state Supreme Court docket to contemplate his attraction in April.
College of Denver Regulation Professor Alan Chen mentioned Tuesday that the Colorado Supreme Court docket should decide if baking a pink cake with blue frosting and no writing “is extra like designing a web site or extra like renting chairs.”
“If it’s not speech, then the one cause that Phillips is refusing to make it’s due to the transgender standing of his consumer, and that violates the legislation,” Chen mentioned.
Scardina tried to order her cake on the identical day in 2017 that the U.S. Supreme Court docket introduced it could hear Phillips’ attraction within the marriage ceremony cake case.
Earlier than submitting her lawsuit, Scardina first filed a criticism in opposition to Phillips with the state and the civil rights fee, which discovered possible trigger that he had discriminated in opposition to her.
Phillips then filed a federal lawsuit in opposition to Colorado, accusing it of a “campaign to crush” him by pursuing the criticism.
In March 2019, attorneys for the state and Phillips agreed to drop each instances below a settlement Scardina was not concerned in. She pursued the lawsuit in opposition to Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop on her personal.
No date was set for a listening to within the case. Each side should submit their authorized arguments to the courtroom within the coming months.
___
Bedayn is a corps member for the Related Press/Report for America Statehouse Information Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit nationwide service program that locations journalists in native newsrooms to report on undercovered points.
___
Related Press reporter Amy Beth Hanson contributed from Helena, Montana.