Opinion: B.C. wants to face up for Fraser estuary in mild of federal authorities's Terminal 2 approval

Article content material

Whereas authorised by the federal authorities, the contentious Roberts Financial institution Terminal 2 enlargement mission nonetheless requires a inexperienced mild from the province of B.C., which just lately introduced a 30-day public remark interval for its set of situations to be offered to the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority.

Article content material

Buried beneath layers of policy-speak and technical jargon, the province’s Environmental Evaluation Workplace lays out a lukewarm set of binding situations for the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, of which most may be summarized with the next assertion: You could plan to make a plan.

Article content material

The province has acknowledged that “wild salmon are essential to the success of our economic system, the prosperity of coastal communities, and the lives, tradition, and historical past of indigenous peoples.” It’s perplexing, then, that lacking from the Environmental Evaluation Workplace’s 17 situations is any point out of necessities to guard or monitor the impacts the mission could have on the Fraser River estuary, one of the necessary salmon nurseries on the Pacific coast.

Article content material

Article content material

Whereas Pacific salmon species are technically underneath federal jurisdiction, the provincial authorities has accountability over salmon habitat and aquatic habitat extra broadly, underneath the Ministry of Setting and Local weather Change Technique and the newly established Ministry of Water, Land, and Useful resource Stewardship. The province can now not defer to the federal authorities on points impacting species in B.C., and must do greater than the naked minimal to make sure that salmon and their habitat are protected. For instance, the province might have included in its set of situations a requirement to make sure that a number of causeway breaches be constructed as a technique to reconnect estuary habitat alienated by the mission.

Article content material

On prime of this, British Columbians are anticipated to belief a provincial environmental assessment course of that has been muddied by a premier who can’t appear to say sufficient constructive issues about Terminal 2. Talking to the Delta Optimist, Premier David Eby missed the myriad ecological considerations raised by quite a few scientists, the Canadian Impression Evaluation Company, the U.S. Environmental Safety Company, the Lummi Nation, and a number of conservation teams, by proclaiming that there isn’t any battle between financial improvement reminiscent of Terminal 2 and environmental safety, and that the province has “proved that that’s a false alternative.”

However the place is that proof? The province, by means of successive governments, has a doubtful observe report relating to managing the ecological impacts of mega initiatives. These impacts have perpetuated habitat loss for threatened and endangered wildlife, together with species of salmon, caribou, and owls. A living proof is the Website C Dam, which was initially authorised primarily based on uncertain projections of future demand in power. It has now failed on each monetary and environmental grounds — it is going to destroy giant swathes of habitat for at-risk species whereas costing taxpayers $16 billion and counting.

Article content material

The Fraser River has greater than over 50 distinctive and irreplaceable salmon populations, together with Chinook runs that endangered Southern Resident killer whales depend on. Practically two-thirds of the Fraser’s salmon populations have been assessed as threatened or endangered by the Committee on the Standing of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Habitat loss, and the federal government selections that drive it, are a major issue within the decline of B.C.’s wild salmon populations and the biodiversity disaster unfolding in B.C.

Our communities need to be totally knowledgeable concerning the dangers Terminal 2 poses, to be given sufficient time to remark, and to be assured that their submissions will likely be thought-about in an unbiased provincial decision-making course of.

British Columbia now has a alternative. Will the province stand by because the federal authorities permits the destruction of important salmon habitat in B.C.? The provincial authorities can both get up in its accountability to guard the irreplaceable ecosystem of the Fraser estuary or it could proceed to face by and watch its decline.

Auston Chhor is a coverage and governance analyst with Raincoast Conservation Basis; Kristen Walters is director of Raincoast’s Decrease Fraser Salmon Conservation Program; Chris Genovali is the executive-director at Raincoast.

Article content material