Opinion: Rights of the river: May granting authorized personhood for the Fraser River estuary spur its safety?

Article content material

Our present strategies of defending necessary ecosystems are usually not working. It’s time for governments in any respect ranges to undertake a special mind-set about pure locations.

Article content material

Right here in Canada, ecosystems and habitats depend on environmental legal guidelines just like the Species at Threat Act (SARA) for his or her safety. On paper, these legal guidelines appear to supply a gamut of authorized protections for pure locations, however in follow these protections usually fall brief as soon as competing pursuits, equivalent to industrial growth, are dropped at the desk.

Article content material

Take the Fraser River estuary on the south coast of B.C., for instance. This ecosystem helps the most important runs of untamed Pacific salmon in Canada and gives essential habitat for endangered Southern Resident killer whales. But in 2023, the federal authorities greenlit the Roberts Financial institution Terminal 2 megaport, which can have vital repercussions for Southern Resident killer whale essential habitat that’s legally protected by SARA. Over within the Wooden River basin of southeastern B.C., the provincial authorities continues to approve clearcuts in Southern Mountain caribou essential habitat, which is, once more, legally protected by SARA.

Article content material

Article content material

This raises the query: How can environmental legal guidelines, equivalent to SARA, serve their supposed goal in the event that they proceed to be routinely overridden in favour of financial pursuits? A central conundrum of the Canadian authorized system is that environmental legal guidelines are too generally subsumed by a worldview that sees pure locations as helpful primarily for the sources that may be extracted from them. This mind-set has laid the inspiration for the degradation of ecosystems throughout Canada.

Though this worldview has proliferated throughout a lot of the developed world, there are alternate, unquantifiable methods of valuing nature. Many Indigenous communities have a reciprocity-based relationship with the setting, one which Dr. Enrique Salmón, a Rarámuri professor of American Indian research, describes as an “consciousness that life in any setting is viable solely when people view the life surrounding them as kin.”

Article content material

Many non-Indigenous governments are starting to discover this attitude, demonstrated by a rising authorized motion often called Rights of Nature. Rights of Nature posits that wildlife, plant communities, and entire ecosystems ought to obtain the identical elementary rights and freedoms as people. The precise to be free from exploitation, the proper to be handled equally, and the proper to exist, free from persecution.

It might sound a stretch to some authorized students to think about rivers, salmon or killer whales as individuals. But our authorized system is already set as much as grant non-human entities like companies standing as “authorized individuals.” In New Zealand, Quebec, Ecuador, and Bolivia, communities have efficiently pushed for some type of Rights of Nature legal guidelines to be accorded to ecosystems round them, setting a brand new precedent for his or her safety in an effort to counterbalance advancing extractive industries.

Article content material

Right here in Canada, “authorized individuals” have rights underneath the legislation, and revel in protections granted by the Constitution of Rights and Freedoms such for granted to vote, the proper to be handled equally, and the proper to maneuver freely. Granting rivers, wetlands, and forests authorized personhood would place the inherent proper of ecosystems to exist above the wants of people to extract pure capital from them.

A report written by UBC legislation pupil Avery Pasternak and Raincoast Conservation Basis’s Kristen Walters identifies that whereas Rights of Nature laws has been adopted in different nations, Canada’s authorized system doesn’t present a transparent pathway for Rights of Nature legal guidelines on the federal or provincial stage.

Nevertheless, there are potentialities on the native stage. The report discovered two mechanisms for advancing authorized personhood for the Fraser River estuary: Indigenous governments establishing Nation-to-Nation agreements, and Nations hanging agreements with native governments which have jurisdiction over the Fraser River estuary. Importantly, authorized recognition should be accompanied by governance reform within the type of guardianship, administration our bodies, or collaborative governance fashions. The authors spotlight that reform ought to be Indigenous-led and undertake a “two-eyed seeing” method that blends Indigenous data and tutorial science.

The worldwide biodiversity and local weather crises have undoubtedly been pushed by an anthropocentric mindset which positions people as having intrinsic supremacy over nature. By shifting in direction of a extra familial, kinship-based relationship with nature, Canada might set a novel authorized technique for addressing the mounting environmental challenges dealing with our nation.

Auston Chhor is a biologist and coverage analyst at Raincoast Conservation Basis; Chris Genovali is Raincoast’s government director.

Article content material